Re: new cleanups

[masinter.pa@Xerox.COM]

I think we should just make what I think is the only reasonable translation:
"relatively useless" means "is not required by this standard to have any effect"'.

I don't think we need a cleanup issue to do that.
- - - - - -



GV-Info: sandra%defun@cs.utah.edu at 28-Apr-89 17:38:51 from AG
Return-Path: <sandra%defun@cs.utah.edu>
Received: from cs.utah.edu ([128.110.4.21]) by Xerox.COM ; 28 APR 89 17:38:13 PDT
Received: from defun.utah.edu by cs.utah.edu (5.61/utah-2.1-cs)
	id AA11376; Fri, 28 Apr 89 18:38:09 -0600
Received: by defun.utah.edu (5.61/utah-2.0-leaf)
	id AA13450; Fri, 28 Apr 89 18:38:06 -0600
From: sandra%defun@cs.utah.edu (Sandra J Loosemore)
Message-Id: <8904290038.AA13450@defun.utah.edu>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 89 18:38:05 MDT
Subject: new cleanups
To: masinter.pa

Is the cleanup committee still in business?  I'd like to open a new
issue to clarify what *EVALHOOK* is supposed to do in compiled-only
implementations, having just run into the problem while writing a new
evaluator.  (CLtL just says it's "relatively useless", whatever that
means.)  I'm not sure if this issue falls in the domain of cleanup or
compiler -- I you think I ought to handle it in compiler I'll send
it there.

-Sandra
-------