[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: in defense of C

To: scheme@mc.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: in defense of C
From: Eric Pepke <mephisto!prism!fsu!gw.scri.fsu.edu!pepke@rutgers.edu>
Date: Fri ,9 Mar 90 09:58:07 EDT
Organization: Florida State University, but I don't speak for them
References: <1942@skye.ed.ac.uk>, <542@fsu.scri.fsu.edu>, <113917@ti-csl.csc.ti.com>
Sender: scheme-request@mc.lcs.mit.edu

Sorry; I misunderstood the controversy.  I feel like Emily Latella.  
"Never mind!"

Eric Pepke                                    INTERNET: pepke@gw.scri.fsu.edu
Supercomputer Computations Research Institute MFENET:   pepke@fsu
Florida State University                      SPAN:     scri::pepke
Tallahassee, FL 32306-4052                    BITNET:   pepke@fsu

Disclaimer: My employers seldom even LISTEN to my opinions.
Meta-disclaimer: Any society that needs disclaimers has too many lawyers.

References:
- Re: in defense of C
  - From: Jeff Dalton <mcsun!ukc!edcastle!aiai!jeff@uunet.uu.net>
- Re: in defense of C
  - From: Eric Pepke <zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!uflorida!mephisto!prism!fsu!gw.scri.fsu.edu!pepke@think.com>
- Re: in defense of C
  - From: John Gateley <cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!swbatl!texbell!texsun!smunews!ti-csl!m2!gateley@yale-zoo.arpa>

Prev by Date: Re: call/cc
Next by Date: Re: call/cc
Previous by thread: Re: in defense of C
Next by thread: Re: in defense of C
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread