[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

AST

To: David Vinayak Wallace <GUMBY@mc.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: AST
From: "David A. Moon" <Moon@scrc-stony-brook.arpa>
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 87 13:09 EST
Cc: slug@r20.utexas.edu, SINGER@spar-20.spar.slb.com
In-reply-to: <291083.871125.GUMBY@AI.AI.MIT.EDU>
Resent-date: Wed 25 Nov 87 15:07:00-CST
Resent-from: CMP.SLUG@r20.utexas.edu
Resent-message-id: <12353504507.26.CMP.SLUG@R20.UTEXAS.EDU>
Resent-to: SLUG:;

You're quite right about AST being the textual format.  I got AST
and KST mixed up with each other, thanks for straightening them out.
I suspect both KST and AST formats were defined by either Stanford
or Carnegie-Mellon originally (maybe so long ago that it was
Carnegie rather than Carnegie-Mellon?).

I don't know about your patches, especially since you didn't include
any comments saying what they do, but I'll pass them along.

References:
- AST
  - From: David Vinayak Wallace <GUMBY@mc.lcs.mit.edu>

Prev by Date: doubling your bits
Next by Date: doubling your bits
Previous by thread: AST
Next by thread: AST
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread