[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Please fill me in....
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 89 08:45 PST
From: Spock@SAMSON.CADR.DIALNET.SYMBOLICS.COM (Mr. Spock)
Maybe I'm mistaken about the general tone of this Symbolic vs.
"Conventional" machines in the area of price/performance/environment but
it sounds to me like some of these unix machines are now viable
alternatives to 36xx's.
Is this really true????
We tried a SUN 3/260 (I think) running Lucid, packed to the gills with
memory, and an extra disk (380 mb, I think) for gobs of paging area and
our 3600 *still* ran circles around it (even when running Fortran!).
And the SUN wound up costing us the same $ as our 3600!
Are the newer SUNs (or whatever) really that much faster? How much
memory/disk do you realistically need? I.e. what do these machines
*really* cost in order to run lisp effectively?
Sun-4's (now called Sparcstations) are much faster than Sun-3's. Our
experience is that Sun-4's are 2-3 times as fast at running Lisp (Lucid
version 3.0) than a 36xx. Note, however, that the benchmark code (the
circuit simulation code we developed to design Connection Machines) has
lots of declarations, which are necessary to get good performance on the
Can you buy a $5-10k workstation that will run lisp effectively?
No. In order to run Lisp effectively, you need a decent amount of
memory (16Mb, I guess) and a local paging disk. This would bring the
total cost of the workstation up to $15-20K.