[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

1Re: Lisp code sharing 0

To: iexist!att!ai.sri!slug@ai.sri.com
Subject: 1Re: Lisp code sharing 0
From: lgm@iexist.att.com
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 1991 17:20:00 -0500
Character-type-mappings: (1 0 (NIL 0) (NIL :CONDENSED NIL) "CPTFONTC")
Fonts: CPTFONT, CPTFONTC
In-reply-to: <19910118151622.7.MILLER@ARWEN.CS.ROCHESTER.EDU>
Original-from: Larry Mayka <iexist!lgm>

    Date: Fri, 18 Jan 91 10:16 EST
    From: miller@SOL.CS.ROCHESTER.EDU (Brad Miller)

1    Which implies we need cheaper lisp systems that someone can reasonably have
    in their own home, no?

0That's what I'd like to see, even if it's only (initially) simply a
low-priced, consumer-oriented version of CLOE.

I have an AT&T UNIX PC at home that I bought at a fire-sale price
several years ago.  (I was younger then.)  Needless to say, it no longer
thrills me.

	Lawrence G. Mayka
	AT&T Bell Laboratories
	lgm@iexist.att.com

Standard disclaimer.

References:
- Re: Lisp code sharing
  - From: miller@SOL.CS.ROCHESTER.EDU (Brad Miller)

Prev by Date: Re: Japanese use of tones
Next by Date: Re: C as Universal Standard
Previous by thread: Re: Lisp code sharing
Next by thread: 1Re: Lisp code sharing 0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

1Re: Lisp code sharing 0

1Re: Lisp code sharing 0