[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
ignored variables in symbolics and lucid
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 21:02+0100
From: Barry Margolin <barmar@Think.COM>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 12:59 EST
From: Bill Long <WJL@ZERMATT.LCS.MIT.EDU>
I have a function the following type of function which works fine in
Symbolics common-lisp:
(defun foo ()
(multiple-value-setq (x () y)(bar))
(list x y))
(defun foo (&aux notused)
(multiple-value-setq (x notused y) (bar))
notused
(list x y))
barmar
That will probably do it.
However, a compiler might optimize away the reference to NOTUSED,
and maybe also tell you about it, so that you still end up getting
warnings.
Markus Fischer, MF@SGER.UUCP Mergenthalerallee 77-81
Statice Development Group W-6236 Eschborn, Germany
Symbolics Systemhaus GmbH Phone: +49 6196 47220, Fax 481116