[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
lisp vs. lsp
- To: bug-lisp at MIT-ML, bug-lispm at MIT-ML, kwc at MIT-ML
- Subject: lisp vs. lsp
- From: Kenneth W. Church <LFG.KWC at MIT-SPEECH>
- Date: Sat, 6 Feb 82 18:59:00 GMT
- Original-date: 6 Feb 1982 1359-EST
this is a real problem that needs to be resolved once and for all.
all lispm software assumes that lisp files are of type "lisp" and
all maclisp code (except lsb) assume "lsp". I would like my code
to run both places. Major screws:
tags will not run on "lisp" files
fs:copy-file will give "lisp" as the type of a file that it thinks is lisp code
complr and (qc-file ...) don't agree
symbolics and mit 20's don:t agree
can we come to some compromise and stick with it.