[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
For the record?
- To: ALAN at MIT-MC
- Subject: For the record?
- From: Kent M. Pitman <KMP at MIT-MC>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 80 17:40:00 GMT
- Cc: BUG-LISP at MIT-MC, GJC at MIT-MC, GSB at MIT-MC, JONL at MIT-MC
- Original-date: 25 September 1980 13:40-EDT
Date: 24 September 1980 18:23-EDT
From: Alan Bawden <ALAN at MIT-MC>
Date: 23 SEP 1980 1500-EDT
From: KMP at MIT-MC (Kent M. Pitman)
The behavior of *FUNCTION with a second arg seems to be ...
If the alternative is to document it. Why don't we just flush it?
Ahh, what a novel thought. I don't really mind anyone doing that either. I
just want it made clear that I am going to try to document anything that is
around in Lisp by default. So if it's going to happen, I plan to try
documenting it. We simply can't have these obscure features that work like
magic and which are passed by word of mouth ... Any seconds on ALAN's motion
for flushing 2nd arg to *FUNCTION? Any discussion?