[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: (BUG LISP) at MIT-MC
- From: KMP at MIT-MC (Kent M. Pitman)
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 80 17:02:00 GMT
- Original-date: 11 SEP 1980 1302-EDT
ignore my previous note. i was looking at evalframe, not
instead substitute the following bug:
When the PDL overflow handler runs, it doesn't set up an errframe.
Why is this? Does it conserve so much stack space that it's not
worth it? I wish ERRSET would trap PDL-OVERFLOW and I wish that
an ERRFRAME would exist when the PDL-OVERFLOW handler is called.