[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: KMP at MIT-MC
- Subject: CHEKC-TYPE
- From: Jon L White <JONL at MIT-MC>
- Date: Mon, 1 Jun 81 20:03:00 GMT
- Cc: BUG-LISP at MIT-MC
- Original-date: 1 June 1981 16:03-EDT
Date: 25 May 1981 00:05-EDT
From: Kent M. Pitman <KMP at MIT-MC>
Is there any reason CHECK-TYPE can't do something with SETF instead of SETQ?
GJC says his generic PUSH/POP definer can make this win.
Yea, this could be hacked -- basically just a usage of EVONCE would
make it win too. By the bye, I'm cc'ing this to bug-lisp, since the ERRCK
facility is usable on just about all LISP's -- not just MacLISP.