[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fill Long Comment.
- To: David Vinayak Wallace <Gumby at MIT-OZ>,
- Subject: Fill Long Comment.
- From: Mike McMahon <MMcM at SCRC-TENEX>
- Date: Thu ,22 Dec 83 23:01:00 EDT
David L. Andre <DLA at SCRC-TENEX>, CMB at SCRC-VIXEN
Cc: BUG-zwei at MIT-OZ, doc-changes at SCRC-TENEX
In-reply-to: The message of 20 Oct 83 02:49-EDT from David Vinayak Wallace <Gumby at MIT-OZ>,
The message of 21 Dec 83 11:27-EST from David L. Andre <DLA at SCRC-TENEX>,
The message of 22 Dec 83 15:39-EST from CMB at SCRC-VIXEN
Date: Thursday, 20 October 1983, 02:49-EDT
From: David Vinayak Wallace <Gumby at MIT-OZ>
Could M-X Fill Long Comment be fixed to act more like M-Q?
Specifically, if I have a set of comments delineated by whilespace, it
should treat the whitespace like a paragraph break, and only
comment-fill the "paragraph" I'm editing. I could get the old behaviour
by marking a region.
Date: 21 Dec 1983 1127-EST
From: David L. Andre <DLA@SCRC-TENEX>
3. M-X Fill Long Comment should only fill one paragraph, as with m-Q.
(my only argumet is consistency...)
In the source. Paragraphs are delimited by blank lines (or blank comment
lines), but not changes in indentation.
Date: Thursday, 22 December 1983, 15:39-EST
From: CMB at SCRC-VIXEN
When it computes the minimum comment width, it should ignore lines that
contain only the comment character. Does this make sense?
This is a side effect of the above.