[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: PATHNAME-SYMBOL
- From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Eric Benson)
- Date: Mon, 1 Jun 87 14:27:11 PDT
If a symbol can be coerced into a string, and a string can be coerced
into a pathname, I see no reason why a symbol should not be coerced
into a pathname. It has limited usefulness, but I believe that
coercions should be transitive. I believe that the aesthetics of the
language will be harmed by disallowing symbols as pathnames.
I'm not going to put up a fight to stop this change, but I would like
to see the minority view stated in the proposal.