[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Issue: SHARPSIGN-PLUS-MINUS-NUMBER (Version 3)
- To: CL-Cleanup@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU
- Subject: Issue: SHARPSIGN-PLUS-MINUS-NUMBER (Version 3)
- From: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 88 10:16 EDT
- In-reply-to: <880523-173849-5795@Xerox>
I support SHARPSIGN-PLUS-MINUS-NUMBER:OK, version 3.
I would mention the "codifying current practice" remark in the rationale.
I would also change "KMP" to "Pitman" where it occurs.