[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Issue: LOAD-TIME-EVAL
- From: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Date: Mon, 19 Sep 88 12:29 EDT
- Cc: CL-Compiler@SAIL.Stanford.EDU, CL-Cleanup@SAIL.Stanford.EDU
- References: <8809191543.AA00753@defun.utah.edu>, <19880918233023.5.GREGOR@PORTNOY.parc.xerox.com>, <880917-151515-2442@Xerox>
Fyi, the following discussion recently took place on CL-Cleanup...
Date: 17 Sep 88 15:15 PDT
I think this is a moderately useful issue to be resolved if the compiler
committee hasn't done so. I'm not on cl-compiler so I don't know what, if any,
progress has been made on the numerous issues that were deferred to them. Was
this one of them?
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 88 19:21 EDT
From: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
The CL-Compiler committee has been actively discussing this, so I think
we can safely ignore it for the time being.
If they fail to reach closure and submit something to X3J13 in a timely
fashion, I will take care of reviving it here.
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 88 16:30 PDT
Given the current X3J13 schedule, what does timely mean? Is there
reason to believe the compiler committee will arrive in Washington with
a detailed proposal that they want the full committee to vote on? If
not, the cleanup committee should probably generate its own proposal