[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Issue: DECLARE-TYPE-FREE (Version 5)

DECLARE-TYPE-FREE:ALLOW in version 5 is okay with me except for
the formatting errors (presumably introduced by the Xerox mailer
line-folding) and the omission of the word "not" before "be" in
"it would be bad style to have inner declarations be subtypes of the
outer ones."  I haven't asked him, but I think this missing word is what
really provoked Kent's comments.