[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Issue: DYNAMIC-EXTENT (Version 1)
- To: CL-Cleanup@SAIL.Stanford.EDU
- Subject: Issue: DYNAMIC-EXTENT (Version 1)
- From: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 88 16:37 EDT
My notes from Fairfax meeting...
Issue names STACK-LET, DYNAMIC-VALUE, and DYNAMIC-VALUE-EXTENT
are obsolete synonyms for this issue.
This issue is related to, but very different than, issue
KMP will write this up, removing the STACK-LET proposal in favor
of something declaration-based.
Masinter: This issue is related to the ISO proposal for multiple
values and rest arguments.
KMP: Perhaps this should be mentioned in Current Practice or Discussion