[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Issue: FUNCTION-COERCE-TIME (Version 2)
- To: CL-Cleanup@SAIL.Stanford.EDU
- Subject: Issue: FUNCTION-COERCE-TIME (Version 2)
- From: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 88 17:03 EDT
My notes from Fairfax meeting...
Masinter: Eliminate the AMBITIOUS proposal. Continue to evolve the
HYBRID and LAZY variants.
KMP: Relation to DEBUG quality.
There was some discussion about the idea of permitting vagueness
(ie, making LAZY/AMBITIOUS optional in some places).
KMP will write next draft.
JonL had some critical comments, but KMP couldn't understand them
and believes it was because JonL didn't read the proposals carefully
and was commenting on a superficial reading that led him to incorrect
Some people weren't completely convinced that the HYBRID proposal
would feel predictable enough. Others disagreed.