[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM
- Subject: Issue: IN-SYNTAX?
- From: Jon L White <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 88 15:46:31 PDT
- Cc: CL-Cleanup@SAIL.Stanford.EDU
- In-reply-to: David A. Moon's message of Fri, 28 Oct 88 14:10 EDT <19881028181006.2.MOON@EUPHRATES.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
re: . . . be careful not to make it impossible to write
programs that set up the environment that they know they want, and then
call LOAD or COMPILE-FILE.
I wondered about this -- namely, is it necessary to provide backwards
compatibility in exactly the same way it is done now, or would some
slightly more kludgy replacement be satisfactory? It has always seemed
to me that the context sensitivity of LOAD/COMPILE-FILE has been a
"throwback" to MacLisp days, where the standard input radix was octal!
But even if 99.44% of all programs never tamper with the improved syntax
standards, I agree that there must be a reasonably convenient way to
overide the "binding" parts of LOAD/COMPILE-FILE. What would you think
of the following avenues:
(1) have a keyword argument to LOAD/COMPILE-FILE that says "start
out in current syntax rather than in standard syntax"; or have
keyword arguments for all the syntax variables.
[Pro: simplest to user; Con: added complexity in general, and
more work for implementors in particular]
(2) have all standard syntax specifications be user-accessible as
the values of special variables; thus ordinary lambda-binding
would suffice for tailoring the "standard" environment.
[Pro: makes the "primitives" user-accessible; Con: the set of
such variables might not be fixed between implementations, and
global-variable access to internal data is less "safe" than
a functional interface to it]
(3) have a documentary suggestion that when one wants to retain the
syntax environment, he should arrange such communication via
his own global variables; e.g.,
(defun my-load (&rest args)
(let ((*my-package* *package*)
(apply #'load args)))
then add the following statement at the beginning of any file
for which this hack is needed:
(in-syntax :package *my-package*
[Pro: puts the burden on the weirdo who _really_ wants this;
Con: can work unless you can modify the in-syntax of the file.]
By the bye, I've ignored *READ-SUPPRESS* and *READ-DEFAULT-FLOAT-FORMAT*
til now. Probably the former doesn't need to be redefinable by the
IN-SYNTAX form, but surely it needs to be "protected" over LOAD/COMPILE-FILE.
As to the latter, I don't have a great argument for it now, but I rather
tend to view it as a global "site installation" parameter, rather than as
a useful dynamic variable; my mind would be changed if I heard of
significant "dynamic" use of it.
-- JonL --