[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue: SETF-PLACES (version 1)
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: Issue: SETF-PLACES (version 1)
- From: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 88 20:00 EST
- In-reply-to: <2805237539-1438981@Kelvin>
I think Gray's points are well-taken and I agree with them (passing
lightly over the typo of DEFCLASS in a list of function-defining forms).
I think they amplify my contention that this proposal is too complicated,
because by introducing a distinction between "names" and "specs" we
have to clarify which functions work with which.