[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue: SETF-PLACES (version 1)

I think Gray's points are well-taken and I agree with them (passing
lightly over the typo of DEFCLASS in a list of function-defining forms).
I think they amplify my contention that this proposal is too complicated,
because by introducing a distinction between "names" and "specs" we
have to clarify which functions work with which.