[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue: TAILP-NIL (version 3)
- To: vanroggen%aitg.DEC@decwrl.dec.com
- Subject: Re: Issue: TAILP-NIL (version 3)
- From: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
- Date: 30 Nov 88 21:29 PST
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
- In-reply-to: vanroggen%aitg.DEC@decwrl.dec.com's message of Tue, 19 Apr 88 19:33:14 PDT (really of 18 Oct 88)
Your version 3 eliminated proposal TAILP-NIL:NIL, but retained some
references to that proposal.
If there are still some folks in favor of TAILP-NIL:NIL, we can go back to
two proposals for the ballot; I don't think that is the case, and we just
need a minor rewrite to fix the current practice, discussion sections.