[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Issue: SETF-SUB-METHODS (Version 5)
- To: cperdue@Sun.COM (Cris Perdue)
- Subject: Issue: SETF-SUB-METHODS (Version 5)
- From: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
- Date: 9 Jan 89 18:16 PST
- Cc: email@example.com
In your ballot, you said:
This does not seem to be the "right" choice of semantics, and I
believe that the presentation of the proposal needs substantial work
even if it is "right".
Can you help us? in what way is it wrong? what might be better? what
cases are unclear that we need to clarify?