[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Issue: FORMAT-ROUNDING (Version 1)

re: My belief is that we've decided we don't like this issue as stated. Would
    it be appropriate to require that IEEE-FLOATING-POINT on *features* implies
    the round-to-nearest algorithm? 

"round-to-nearest" isn't sufficient; it should be "IEEE round-to-nearest",
which has implications for "ties".

However, both Moon and I seemed to prefer not trying to specify something 
in the standard for the case this issue is addressing.

-- JonL --