[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue: SETF-SUB-METHODS (Version 5)
- To: cperdue@Sun.COM, masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
- Subject: Re: Issue: SETF-SUB-METHODS (Version 5)
- From: cperdue@Sun.COM (Cris Perdue)
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 89 15:59:45 PST
- Cc: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
> I believe that this will get voted on at this meeting unless there is a
> successful motion to table it.
If so I'll vote against but with willingness to reconsider,
especially if the proposal can be stated much more simply.