[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Issue: LISP-PACKAGE-NAME, (Version 1)

I have two comments with regard to this proposal; first, it should mention
the user package (perhaps cl-user), secondly there is a much simpler way to
get print/read inconsistency than that described in the proposal, just have
*PACKAGE* bound to a package that does not use CL be current when printing.
I would feel better requiring CL:SYMBOL-PACKAGE returning the CL package
for symbols defined in the spec.