[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New issue ADJUST-ARRAY-NOT-ADJUSTABLE-BROKEN
- To: gls@Think.COM
- Subject: Re: New issue ADJUST-ARRAY-NOT-ADJUSTABLE-BROKEN
- From: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
- Date: 3 Feb 89 15:57 PST
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
- In-reply-to: gls@Think.COM's message of Thu, 2 Feb 89 00:19:06 EST
Procedurally, I'd rather handle this as a motion to reconsider the previous
version of ADJUST-ARRAY-NOT-ADJUSTABLE rather than as a new issue. My
reason is that at some point we will probably need to release the "passed"
issues as a description to the community as to what we did and why; I'd
rather not leave ADJUST-ARRAY-NOT-ADJUSTABLE as unamended. So I'm happy to
mail out your message with Problem and Proposal, but in the final state,
just have an amended ADJUST-ARRAY-NOT-ADJUSTABLE issue.
This is not terribly important, but we would need a revised version of
ADJUST-ARRAY-NOT-ADJUSTABLE if the motion passes.