[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue: READ-CASE-SENSITIVITY (Version 1)
- To: pierson <@multimax.encore.com:email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: Issue: READ-CASE-SENSITIVITY (Version 1)
- From: Jeff Dalton <jeff%aiai.edinburgh.ac.uk@NSS.Cs.Ucl.AC.UK>
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 89 17:25:45 GMT
- Cc: CL-Cleanup@sail.stanford.edu, KMP@scrc-stony-brook.arpa
> The intent that READ be useful as a lexer for data or embedded
> languages is clear. It's also clear that you're asking for an
> extension to the lexer's power that is not required for Common Lisp.
Sure, but character macros aren't required for reading standard-syntax
Common Lisp either.
> I think that it is a reasonable and useful extension if properly
> You can put me down as likely to support a readtable-based case
> control extension, however Peck's point that such an extension must
> not conflict with the new character proposal is important.
Hummm. I don't think it should be hard to be compatible. Automatic
case conversion seems more likely to run into trouble when there are
lots of different character sets (some, presumably, without a notion
But it's nontrivial to design something of this sort. The options seem
* some way just to turn case concersion on and off
* a way to specify a conversion for every character
(normally, some would be converted to upper case)
[I can imagine lots of objections to this since
it would make readtables bigger, it would have to
say what happens when one of the characters is
defined as a macro, etc.]
* define some way for character macro functions to return
a substitute character (or characters?).
* [maybe] specify an alternative character set that doesn't
have case conversion.