[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: CL-Cleanup@SAIL.Stanford.EDU
- Subject: Issue: FUNCTION-NAME
- From: Kent M Pitman <KMP@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Date: Tue, 4 Apr 89 14:16 EDT
My notes show the following...
We voted in order SMALL, MEDIUM, then LARGE.
Each time, the attempt was to replace the previous.
Option SMALL passed 15-2.
Option MEDIUM passed 9-6, superseding SMALL.
Option LARGE passed 13-2-3, superseding MEDIUM.
The minutes probably just reflect LARGE having been passed.
Moon then moved that we reconsider parts of LARGE -- parts 4,7,8,9.
We agreed to reconsider.
Sandra moved to retract 4,7,8,9.
RPG amended the proposal to affect GENERIC-FLET and GENERIC-LABELS, too,
RPG's amendment to Sandra's motion passed.
We voted on each part of Sandra's motion separately:
Strike 4? No. (Failed 3-15)
Strike 7? Yes. (Passed 16-1)
Strike 8? Yes. (Passed 16-0)
Strike 9? Yes (Passed 17-0-1)
There was some question about 9's relation to SYNTACTIC-ENVIRONMENT-ACCESS.
The net effect is that option LARGE passed with amendments to strike 7,8,9.