[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


I've finally found time to look over the hardcopy of this issue that
was distributed at the March meeting, but I'm having an extremely
difficult time parsing it.  The description is spread out in too many
places (the proposal section, the list of amendments, and the attached
document), and there are some things mentioned in the discussion
section that appear to contradict what is actually in the proposal
(like whether the list form of the CONS type specifier is a real type
specifier or not).  Can somebody please revise this writeup so that it
is organized more coherently?  I realize this issue is long and
complicated, but improving the presentation would make it a lot more