[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[chapman%aitg.DEC@decwrl.dec.com: question @ SUBTYPEP-TOO-VAGUE]
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: [chapman%aitg.DEC@decwrl.dec.com: question @ SUBTYPEP-TOO-VAGUE]
- From: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
- Date: 3 May 89 16:51 PDT
- Cc: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM
My record says that we passed version 4 at the January meeting, Guy
produced version 5 in March, but that we didn't discuss version 5, postpone
version 5, or otherwise deal with version 5 at the March meeting. I think
this one fell between the cracks... right?
----- Begin Forwarded Messages -----
Date: 1 May 89 13:08
Subject: question @ SUBTYPEP-TOO-VAGUE
The last version I got of SUBTYPEP-TOO-VAGUE reads like it is
Version 5, but doesn't have Version 5 in the header. That's no
big deal, but since it has some big changes from Version 4, I
wondered if what I got was just a review copy or a final draft?
The reason you're getting this question (vs. KMP) is that your
name appeared twice and last in the revision list.
----- End Forwarded Messages -----