[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue: PATHNAME-SYSTEM-TYPE (version 1)

I don't have any big objection to this proposal but I've never had any
pressing need for anything like this either.  I guess I would probably
vote against it unless somebody can argue that it really offers necessary 
functionality, on the general principle of opposing adding things to the
language just because they seem hypothetically "plausible".