[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue: PATHNAME-WILD (version 5)

>     The Explorer permits DELETE-FILE on a wild pathname, meaning to delete
>     all files that match.
> I don't think this should be a mandated feature, but we can add it to current
> practice.  Do you think this feature of the Explorer is good or a wart?  I.e.
> would you like the proposal to say that the consequences are unspecified, or
> would you like the proposal to require the Explorer to change?

I think it's a useful feature (especially on a Lisp Machine where Lisp
is the operating system command language); I'd prefer "consequences
are unspecified" so that this would be a permissible extension.