[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Comments on current state of Initialization.
re: Date: Sat, 21 May 88 06:44:29 PDT
From: Jon L White <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Why should there still be three initialization protocls: "shared-
initialize", "initialize-instance", and "reinitialize-instance"?
[Summary: replace reinitialize-instance with a keyword argument to
Two reasons come immediately to mind: shared-initialize is also used when a
class is redefined or change-class is called; . . .
It seemed obvious to me that the "internal" callers from change-class etc.
could just as easily use a simpilifed definition of initialize-instance with
-- JonL --