[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: method combination objects
> 89-003 is so full of errors that I don't generally find it useful to
> comment on it.
Yes, but then what _are_ we going to do with it? :-)
> ... However, the macro expansion of DEFGENERIC has to have
> some way to convert the :METHOD-COMBINATION option from a list into
> an object of type METHOD-COMBINATION. I don't see anything wrong
> with the writeup on 89-003 p.3-61, unless maybe it needs an environment
> argument, so I don't think it's a mistake.
Sounds then like it should be MAKE-METHOD-COMBINATION instead of