[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hello / byte-compilation
- To: clisp-list <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: Hello / byte-compilation
- From: email@example.com (kr)
- Date: kr\r\essword:, 18 Jul 1995 17:24:51 -0800
At 19:10 7/18/95, Don Cohen wrote:
>Cross compiling: since the lisp code is byte compiled, I had originally
>expected that clisp would be compiled code compatible across all platforms.
>It turns out that this is not true. But it's close. I spent a little
>time looking into how to make it so, but didn't actually do it. I really
>don't think it's difficult, except for macros that expand differently for
>different machines. I'm pretty sure all the system supplied macros could
>be easily fixed to compile into the same byte code for all machines (put
>the machine dependence into functions called by the expansion). Of course,
>the programmer would be responsible for his own macros.
I have to admit that I know almost nothing about this.
But it seems both Emacs and CLISP are byte-compiling. Would it be difficult
to make CLISP generate (and process) Emacs byte-code ? I do not know how
general and powerful each of these systems is, but it would make a lot of
sense to have only one common standard, to enable easier code-sharing.
Also, isn't the Emacs byte-code portable across platforms ?? It might make
a good substitute for HotJava, as Emacs has probably a much wider