[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CLTL compatible type contagion?
- To: clisp-list <email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: CLTL compatible type contagion?
- From: Raymond Toy <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Aug 1995 14:55:39 -0400
- In-reply-to: (Your message of Mon, 07 Aug 1995 00:04:40 +0200.) <199508061947.TAA11361@sayre.sysc.pdx.edu>
>>>>> "Marcus" == Marcus Daniels <email@example.com> writes:
>>>>> "Raymond" == Raymond Toy <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Raymond> This behavior makes numerical work more difficult than it
Raymond> should be.
Marcus> Others may disagree. :-)
Raymond> Does anyone know where the routines are that cause this
Raymond> behavior? I'd like to change it in my own copy of clisp.
Raymond> I tried looking through the source, but I don't read
Marcus> This hack just addresses your particular example, though.
Thanks for the hint. I haven't decided if I really want to do this or
Marcus> Personally, I like being reminded by CLISP about such
Marcus> careless behavior.
I agree, it is nice, but I wish it could remind me a bit more
loudly. :-) Silently making all (following) results a single-float
makes it very difficult to find out where I made the original