[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: format ~/function/
Leigh Smith wrote in August:
> > 4. The manual mentioned in a previous message is 2 years old. (it is
> > also in TeX, i.e.., unusable for those of us stuck with win32. What
> > about (gnu)info, to be read with emacs?)
> In 1997, it would be logical to write a manual in HTML. I'm not going to
> do it, though (lack of time). Any volunteers?
And what would become logical in 1998?
I would find it more natural to suggest to write it in texinfo, as a
plethora of filters exist for conversion into (GNU)info (as desired),
html (as you want), AmigaGuide (for the Amiga), dvi (for TeX quality
output) and maybe others.
Do we really need a 7MB Netscape (or probably worse, MS-*) bloat just
to be able to read manpages?