[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re[4]: type real

>      Sorry about being overly terse (my habitual sin...) 
>      I *know* about (declare (type whatever)).
>      My point is that according to CLtL2, (declare (real ...)) *should* 
>      work, that's it.
The type REAL is a CLtL2 addition;  Clisp does not implement all of CLtL2.

     ... Yet.
     Isn't it the shining goal to be ANSI compliant?
     (except for the ~/function/ heresy, of course :-)