[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re[3]: type real

Sam Shteingold <sshteingold@cctrading.com> wrote:
> >      My point is that according to CLtL2, (declare (real ...)) *should* 
> >      work, that's it.

Pierpaolo Bernardi <bernardp@CLI.DI.Unipi.IT> replied:
> The type REAL is a CLtL2 addition;  Clisp does not implement all of CLtL2.

Actually, the type REAL was in CLISP before I ever saw CLtL2, because
it was a very natural addition. The fact that X3J13 issue <151> influences
table 4-1 and hence the list of valid declarations just slipped through
my eyes. That will be corrected.