[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: common-lisp-object-system@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU
- Subject: STANDARD-TYPE-CLASS
- From: David A. Moon <Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Date: Sat, 3 Jan 87 18:27 EST
- In-reply-to: The message of 31 Dec 86 18:14 EST from Dick Gabriel <RPG@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU>
I agree with the conclusions Dick reached in the referenced message.
I only have one thing to add, which is to make sure that we don't lose
sight of the original issue that brought this up (this time), which was
to clarify the explanation of such things as which classes are not valid
as superclasses in a DEFCLASS form. This is less ethereal than writing
programs that reason about the Lisp implementation, but not less important.