[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: fixing our problems with setf

> Add to Common Lisp the same concept of "setf functions" that we are
> already introducing in CLOS.  Right now, Common Lisp only has "setf

I endorse this. I don't see any need to change the TRACE proposal, 
since (SETF <function name>) was one of the function specifications
included. Do you?