[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug in DCODE-CACHE-MISS, any fixes?
- To: Is Eternal Vigilance the price of Liberty? 02-Nov-1989 1204 <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: Bug in DCODE-CACHE-MISS, any fixes?
- From: Gregor.pa@Xerox.COM
- Date: Thu, 2 Nov 89 19:58 PST
- Cc: CommonLoops.pa@Xerox.COM
- Fcc: BD:>Gregor>mail>outgoing-mail-7.text.newest
- In-reply-to: <8911021703.AA13561@decwrl.dec.com>
- Line-fold: no
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 89 09:03:54 -0800
From: email@example.com (Is Eternal Vigilance the price of Liberty? 02-Nov-1989 1204)
Recently, I ran into a problem with DCODE-CACHE-MISS. The
problem is that the parameter NEXT-SCAN-LIMIT gets bound to
either one of my own values (the current event in a discrete
event simulation), or the class of the method that is being
I heard about this problem once, as I recall it may be because either:
you have methods with non-congruent lambda lists
you are calling a generic function with too few required arguments (or
maybe it was too many).
Both of these are just guesses. Sorry but I am not maintaining that
version of PCL anymore. I am working on a new one which doesn't even
have a function by that name.