[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org (Steve Hain)
- Subject: Re: info
- From: email@example.com (Tom Donaldson)
- Date: Thu, 25 May 1995 06:35:16 -0400
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
- Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org
At 12:09 PM 5/24/95, Steve Hain wrote:
>At 7:45 AM 5/24/95, Tom Donaldson wrote:
>>Will MCL 3.0 allow calling foreign functions compiled "model -far"? MCL
>>2.0.1 does not.
>MCL 3.0 does not support the far model. You may be able to generate a code
>resource containing your code and access it that way. There are a couple of
>examples (one for Think C and one for Codewarrior C) that implement code
>resource linking schemes in our contributions directory at ftp.digitool.com
I was afraid you were going to say that.
However, standalone code resources must be compiled model near. This is
exactly the problem I have with SmalltalkAgents: they too can load any
standalone code resource -- standalone code resources are the limiting
Or, are Codewarrior-generated code resources somehow different than
MPW-generated code resources? Can Codewarrior-generated code resources
contain model-far code?
Can MCL use CFM (Code Fragment Manager) managed code? If I *could* get
a CFM version of the lib, would I be able to call it?
The developer responsible for the Mac version of the lib expressed interest
in hacking a SOM version of the lib in his "spare time", rather than CFM.
Would I be able to use it?
Work: email@example.com (http://www.pls.com)