[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Floating hats
- To: ALAN at MIT-MC
- Subject: Re: Floating hats
- From: Kent M. Pitman <KMP at MIT-MC>
- Date: Mon ,26 Jan 81 17:19:00 EDT
- Cc: GJC at MIT-MC, LISP-FORUM at MIT-MC, MOON at MIT-MC
Date: 26 January 1981 00:19-EST
From: Alan Bawden <ALAN>
To: GJC, MOON, LISP-FORUM
Re: George, take a walk until your hat floats.
Date: 25 January 1981 23:29-EST
From: George J. Carrette <GJC at MIT-MC>
... Shouldn't that info ... at least be lisp readable in the file? ...
... Some files start out with a line saying "-*-Mode:Text-*-", should that
be "lisp readable"? ...
I'll argue that it should be. I am a firm believer that in spite of "#" and
readmacro characters and format ~mumbles and loop, the thing that makes lisp
win is that that it really has a simple syntax. the parser needed for vanilla
lisp syntax is about the simplist you could devise. Further, many non-lispy
languages have support for grokking lisp syntax -- eg, Teco and Midas. How
many can boast of similar support for an algolesque syntax like -*-Mode:Text-*-
-- not even Algol itself ... So I think you have to agree that George's
argument is not so far out of line as you might have originally felt.
Fredkin, in introducing Lisp to 6.034 when I took it a few years back, claimed
that one of the advantages of lisp was that it was `syntax free' ... I claim
that arguing for Lispy notation is just arguing for syntaxlessness and is