[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Moon's comments on Draft 11
- To: Moon@stony-brook.scrc.symbolics.COM
- Subject: Re: Moon's comments on Draft 11
- From: Gregor Kiczales <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Nov 1990 19:19:00 PST
- Cc: jonl@lucid.COM, mop@arisia.Xerox.COM
- Fake-sender: firstname.lastname@example.org
- In-reply-to: "Moon@STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM's message of Thu, 1 Nov 1990 07:49:00 PST <19901101154941.6.MOON@KENNETH-WILLIAMS.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>"
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 1990 07:49:00 PST
My objection is to STANDARD-METHOD being used for two distinct purposes:
as the default class of methods for DEFMETHOD, and as the superclass of
several other classes. These purposes are distinct and should be served
by separate classes.
Yes, this is a problem. I favor the first solution. Trying to get the
second solution to work would involve coming up with a name for the new
interposed class. That leads very quickly, at least in my mind, to a
reexamination of all the names we are using so far.