[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: mop.PARC@xerox.com
- Subject: CLASS-DIRECT-INSTANCES?
- From: Jon L White <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 1991 14:21:32 PST
The following reply to a query on comp.lang.clos give one more inch
of evidence for the utility of the phrases "direct instances" and
"indirect" or "derived" instances.
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 91 14:08:44 MST
From: email@example.com (Skip Egdorf)
In-Reply-To: (Michael H Bender's message of 11 Feb 91 18:18:40 GMT <MIKEB.91Feb11101840@wdl35.wdl.loral.com>
Subject: RE: accessing clos objects
. . .
I have implemented such a metaclass using the accessors for
class name-object mapping as a model. This scheme allows
(class-direct-instances class), (instance-name object),
(find-instance obect), and (setf (instance-name object) ...) on any
instances of classes of this new metaclass.
. . .
Out of curiosity, is this email disucssion list "dead" now? Is there
going to be any further discussion of the "pink" book?
-- JonL --