[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Technical committee
- To: Fahlman@C.CS.CMU.EDU
- Subject: Re: Technical committee
- From: Martin <GRISS@HP-HULK>
- Date: Sat 22 Feb 86 08:15:26-PST
- Cc: GRISS@HP-HULK
- In-reply-to: Message from ""Scott E. Fahlman" <Fahlman@C.CS.CMU.EDU>" of Thu 20 Feb 86 20:23:56-PST
- Mail-from: GRISS created at 22-Feb-86 08:15:26
- Resent-date: Mon 24 Feb 86 15:20:28-PST
- Resent-from: Martin <GRISS%HP-HULK@HPLABS>
- Resent-to: rpg%su-ai@HPLABS
Received: from hplabs.ARPA by HP-HULK with TCP; Thu 20 Feb 86 20:23:54-PST
Received: from C.CS.CMU.EDU ([220.127.116.11]) by hplabs.ARPA ; Thu, 20 Feb 86 12:26:26 pst
Received: ID <FAHLMAN@C.CS.CMU.EDU>; Thu 20 Feb 86 22:56:03-EST
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1986 22:48 EST
From: "Scott E. Fahlman" <Fahlman@C.CS.CMU.EDU>
Subject: Technical committee
I have tried to reach Dick to discuss this, and we have been playing
telephone tag. I agree with your reasons for considering me. I am
interested in the ISO activity, and have some interest in serving, but
the time issue bothers me. To what degree could I make use of an
"alternate" (or even nominate an alternate) from the company,
especially someone more directly involved in CL implementation (say
Alan Snyder from the labs, or Dave Mathews from FSD)?. To be
perfectty candid, most of my time these days is NOT focused on LISP
fundamentals, but much more of AI applied to SW engineering.
Have you also considered Bob Kessler for some role. He has taken up
the banner of PSL-like implementations in the Common LISP context?
I also have fairly good contacts with many of people on the Eulisp
committee, so again there is a rationale for my involvement, even if I
have to delegate some of the work.
Perhaps we could chat on phone?