[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Issue: SETF-METHOD-FOR-SYMBOLS (version 1)
- To: "David A. Moon" <Moon@SCRC-STONY-BROOK.ARPA>
- Subject: Issue: SETF-METHOD-FOR-SYMBOLS (version 1)
- From: "Scott E. Fahlman" <Fahlman@C.CS.CMU.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1987 12:05 EDT
- Cc: CL-Cleanup@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU
- In-reply-to: Msg of 22 Sep 1987 10:56-EDT from David A. Moon <Moon at STONY-BROOK.SCRC.Symbolics.COM>
- Sender: FAHLMAN@C.CS.CMU.EDU
Maybe we should fix the manual's definition for setf of ldb rather than
the values returned for symbol? Or if fixing ldb is really too hairy
under the current setf definition, maybe this shold be the example we
use in the cleanup proposal.
-- Scott