[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue: UNWIND-PROTECT-CLEANUP-NON-LOCAL-EXIT (Version 2)

To: cl-cleanup@Sail.stanford.edu, Hornig@SCRC.Symbolics.COM
Subject: Re: Issue: UNWIND-PROTECT-CLEANUP-NON-LOCAL-EXIT (Version 2)
From: Pavel.pa@Xerox.COM
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 87 17:55:55 PDT
In-reply-to: <871024-173113-2262@Xerox>

I support 1-RETURN-INNER because of the semantic cleanliness issue.  I
don't give much credit to the unbreakable loop issue; it doesn't seem
like a linguistic issue to me.  After all, Common Lisp doesn't even
admit that there is such a thing as an interrupt character.

I also support 2-EXIT.

	Pavel

References:
- Issue: UNWIND-PROTECT-CLEANUP-NON-LOCAL-EXIT (Version 2)
  - From: Masinter.pa@Xerox.COM

Prev by Date: Issue Status
Next by Date: Issue: UNWIND-PROTECT-CLEANUP-NON-LOCAL-EXIT (Version 2)
Previous by thread: Issue: UNWIND-PROTECT-CLEANUP-NON-LOCAL-EXIT (Version 2)
Next by thread: Issue: UNWIND-PROTECT-CLEANUP-NON-LOCAL-EXIT (Version 2)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread