[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue: LET-TOP-LEVEL (version 1)

To: Jon L White <edsel!jonl@labrea.Stanford.EDU>
Subject: Re: Issue: LET-TOP-LEVEL (version 1)
From: Pavel.pa@Xerox.COM
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 88 10:52:27 PST
Cc: cl-cleanup@sail.stanford.EDU
In-reply-to: <8803040151.AA14256@bhopal.lucid.com>

I'm completely lost by your message.  My point had nothing to do with top-level
forms at all.  It was simply making a case for allowing DEFMACRO-defined
expansion functions to make use of their lexical environment.

	Pavel

Follow-Ups:
- Issue: LET-TOP-LEVEL (version 1)
  - From: Jon L White <edsel!jonl@labrea.Stanford.EDU>

References:
- Issue: LET-TOP-LEVEL (version 1)
  - From: Jon L White <edsel!jonl@labrea.Stanford.EDU>

Prev by Date: Re: compiler-warning-break
Next by Date: Cleanup subcommittee meeting, Tuesday 15 March, 9:00-12:00
Previous by thread: Issue: LET-TOP-LEVEL (version 1)
Next by thread: Issue: LET-TOP-LEVEL (version 1)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread