[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Issue: WITH-OPEN-STRING-APPEND-STYLE (Version 2)

To: masinter.pa@xerox.com
Subject: Issue: WITH-OPEN-STRING-APPEND-STYLE (Version 2)
From: Jon L White <edsel!jonl@labrea.stanford.edu>
Date: Mon, 23 May 88 16:40:40 PDT
Cc: cl-cleanup@sail.stanford.edu
In-reply-to: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM's message of 23 May 88 13:04 PDT <880523-130454-5166@Xerox>

re: nits

Sure, flush any item under "Aesthetics:" -- I don't see it as being important
on this issue.

As to "Adoption Cost" versus "Cost to Users" - I have been following a
hardcopy you passed out some time ago at one of the X3J13 meetings, titled
"Format for proposals to 'clean up' Common Lisp".  Since this is now outdated,
perhaps you want to pass out new hardcopies at the next meeting


-- JonL --

References:
- Re: Issue: WITH-OPEN-STRING-APPEND-STYLE (Version 2)
  - From: masinter.pa@Xerox.COM

Prev by Date: Issue: STANDARD-INPUT-INITIAL-BINDING (version 3)
Next by Date: Re: Issue: STANDARD-INPUT-INITIAL-BINDING (version 3)
Previous by thread: Issue: WITH-OPEN-STRING-APPEND-STYLE (Version 2)
Next by thread: Issue: WITH-OPEN-STRING-APPEND-STYLE (Version 2)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread